Root cause: Dual-source architecture for owner password (Gitea secret
ENV_OWNER_PASSWORD vs host .env OWNER_PASSWORD) caused drift when
the DB was ever re-seeded or the volume recreated.
Changes:
- Add SeedAudit entity + migration to track one-time seed operations
- EnsureDatabaseAsync checks SeedAudit BEFORE seeding — owner is never
re-created even if the Users table is wiped
- Deploy and rollback workflows now read OWNER_PASSWORD from the host's
persistent .env (single source of truth) instead of Gitea secrets
- compose.yaml documented: OWNER_PASSWORD only used during initial seed
- Cleanup: .gitignore extended for core dumps, changelog/deployment.md
updated with 2026-06-20 session notes
After this fix the DB is the single source of truth for the owner
password after initial seed. The host .env is the single reference
for the initial value.
- Postgres memory: 256M→384M limits, 64M→96M reservations
- Added pg_resetwal -f pre-deploy step to recover from corrupt WAL
('PANIC: could not locate a valid checkpoint record' caused by
force-killed postgres during --force-recreate)
- Added data-checksums initdb arg for future corruption detection
- api→postgres and web→api depends_on: service_healthy→service_started
- Deploy wait loop: fail fast on unhealthy, wait on starting (180s)
- Added researcher/executor to ValidAssignees and frontend dropdowns
- Bao darf jetzt Status ändern (neben Iris), Sub-Agents weiterhin nicht
- CanEditContent für Inhaltsbearbeitung durch alle bekannten Caller
- Bao-Content-Änderungen triggern task_content_changed-Notification an Iris
- Bao-Status-Änderungen triggern task_status_changed-Notification an Iris
- Iris-Status-Änderungen triggern task_status_changed-Notification an Bao
- Neue WorkTask-Felder: IsAgentTask (bool), ExpectedFrom (string)
- Agent-Workflow-API: CreateAgentTask, WaitingTasks, AgentOverview
- Frontend: Agent-Task-Badge, Iris-Overview-Panel, isBao-Getter
- Login-Rate-Limiter mit strukturiertem JSON-Fehlermeldungs-Body
- Volume-Name: nexus-postgres → postgres-data (Standardisierung)
- [Authorize(Roles = "owner,admin")] statt nur owner – admin darf jetzt
ebenfalls User verwalten
- CreateUser erlaubt nur Rollen admin|user|viewer; owner ist blockiert
- UpdateUserRole erlaubt nur admin|user|viewer; owner kann weder gesetzt
noch überschrieben werden; admin darf andere admins nicht ändern
und sich nicht selbst herabstufen
- SettingsView: canManageUsers = role owner || admin statt nur owner
- UI-Dropdown zeigt nur admin|user|viewer (owner als Kommentar notiert)